Fields and Dennis LLP

  • Our Firm
    • Our Approach and Philosophy
    • News and Media Coverage
  • Attorneys
    • Sheryl J. Dennis
    • Jonathan E. Fields
    • Vicki L. Shemin, J.D., LICSW, ACSW
    • Hugh F. Ferguson, Ph.D.
    • Andrea E. DeLaney
    • Wendie E. Murstein
    • Jonathan Crafts
    • S. Robert Fish, Jr.
    • James E. O’Connell, Jr.
    • Support Staff
      • RIKKI B. SAKSIK
  • Practices
    • Online Divorce Mediations
    • Fledgling Estate Plan for Millennials
    • Family Law
    • Divorce
    • Dispute Resolution
    • Estate Planning
    • Elder Law
    • Guardianship
    • Probate
    • Real Estate Law
    • Civil Litigation
    • Business Litigation
    • White-Collar Criminal & Regulatory Defense and Investigations
    • Mediation
    • Collaborative Law
    • Parent Coordinator
    • Arbitration
  • Resources
    • Covid 19 / Coronavirus Resource Page
    • Fledgling Estate Plan
    • Legal Information
    • Significant Cases
    • Psychology of Divorce
    • Cyber Issues and Divorce
    • Books + Videos
  • Blogs
    • Fields and Dennis LLP Blog
    • Divorce And Mediation Blog
    • Massachusetts Estate Planning Blog
  • Contact
    • Online Consultations & Mediations
    • Map & Directions
    • Pay Invoices Online
    • Contact Us
  • What Others are Saying
  • (781) 489-6776
You are here: Home / Archives for Massachusetts Divorce

Limits of Attorney-Client Privilege

A recent Superior Court case held that a divorce lawyer who was sued for malpractice by a client could depose the successor counsel who represented that client in a modification action. That the client waives attorney-client privilege when malpractice is asserted is black-letter law. Here, the court extended that waiver to the successor counsel hired to fix the problems that the original lawyer had allegedly failed to address. The case should, at the very least, remind mediators that our confidentiality statute isn’t bulletproof — in the event of a malpractice claim, the statute will not protect mediation communications from disclosure. See, e.g. Bobick v. United States Fid. & Guar. Co., 439 Mass. 625, 658 n.11 (2003). DiPietro v. Erickson, 2010 WL 1178410 (Mass.Super.) (March 16, 2010).

Filed Under: Massachusetts Divorce, Quarterly Reviews

Automatic Restraining Order

During the pendency of a divorce action, the Barnstable Probate and Family Court found that the wife’s restatement of her revocable living trust so as to longer provide the husband with a life estate in the marital home was not a violation of the automatic restraining order, Rule 411.  Central to the holding was that title to the home was not conveyed or transferred – and that the asset was not placed outside of the Court’s reach for purposes of equitable distribution.  The restatement only affected Husband’s expectancy of a future interest which does not implicate Rule 411.  To those who had wondered whether changing a will violated Rule 411, this case provides good ammunition that it does not.   Darden v. Darden (Lawyers Weekly No. 15-001-09) (October 15, 2009) (published in Lawyers Weekly February 15, 2010). [Read more…]

Filed Under: Massachusetts Divorce, Massachusetts Family Law, Quarterly Reviews

Imputing Capital Gains and Broker Fees

Imputing Capital Gains and Broker Fees – A former husband appealed from a divorce judgment relative to a particular property division.  Among his claims, he disagreed with the judge’s rejection of his request to have capital gains tax and real estate broker’s fees taken into account in valuing a particular property.  The Appeals Court upheld the judgment, noting that “without evidence that the husband intended to sell the property or would be compelled to sell the property as a result of the division of assets, it was not clearly erroneous for the judge to decline to consider adverse capital gains tax consequences or broker’s fees.”  If Bernier v. Bernier, 449 Mass. 774 (2007) had not already done so, this is yet another “nail in the coffin” for imputing broker’s fees and capital gains where no sale of the at-issue property is imminent.   Gentilella v. Fillion, 73 Mass.App.Ct. 1121 (February 13, 2009) (Unpublished) [Read more…]

Filed Under: Massachusetts Divorce, Massachusetts Family Law, Quarterly Reviews

Supreme Court Upholds “Plan Document” Rule

Supreme Court Upholds “Plan Document” Rule – Resolving a split between the federal circuit courts, the United States Supreme Court upheld the so-called “plan document” rule in finding that plan administrators must pay benefits under an ERISA plan according to the beneficiary designation on file with them.  In this case, the ex-spouse had purportedly waived her rights to her ex-husband’s 401-k in a divorce agreement that was subsequently incorporated in a judgment.  The ex-husband died, having neglected to change the beneficiary designation; consequently, the ex-wife was still designated as the beneficiary on the plan document at the time of his death.   The plan administrators, relying on that designation, paid the benefits to the ex-wife and the executrix of the ex-husband’s estate sued, alleging that the ex-wife had no rights to the benefits as a result of the divorce judgment.  The executrix, however, may not be out of remedies as the decision does not make clear whether the estate would have a cause of action against the ex-wife for breach of the divorce agreement.  The case law on this issue, too, is divided – with some courts allowing a breach of contract action in these circumstances and others holding that ERISA preempts (i.e. does not permit) such actions.  Kennedy v. Plan Adm’r for DuPont Sav. and Inv. Plan, 129 S.Ct. 865 (January 26, 2009)

Attorney Jonathan Fields of Fields and Dennis, Wellesley, Massachusetts is a family law and divorce lawyer serving the Greater Boston region.

Filed Under: Massachusetts Divorce, Massachusetts Family Law, Quarterly Reviews

Challenge To New Child Support Guidelines

Challenge to New Child Support Guidelines – The organization “Fathers and Families” brought suit in federal court to prevent the implementation of the new child support guidelines. According to the complaint, the guidelines were formulated without obtaining data on the cost of raising a child in Massachusetts in contravention of federal law.  The suit also contends that because the law was implemented without a vote by the state legislature, but rather by a single “unelected judge,” it violates the state and federal constitutions.  Notably, according to the suit, Massachusetts is one of only three states in which child support guidelines are implemented without legislative action. As for the federal court action, the judge ordered the Attorney General to file a motion to dismiss by January 28, 2009 – not a good sign for the plaintiff; but the issue would still be viable even if it the federal suit were dismissed as the suit could be refiled in state court.  Fathers and Families v. Robert A. Mulligan (filed December 23, 2008) [Read more…]

Filed Under: Massachusetts Divorce, Massachusetts Family Law, Quarterly Reviews

Unequal Division Upheld

Unequal Division Upheld – The Appeals Court upheld a Probate Court judgment that ordered a 60-40 division in favor of the wife, finding that while the parties had contributed equally to the acquisition of marital assets but that the wife made superior contributions in terms of managing the assets and in her post-separation duties as the primary custodial parent.  Further justifying the result was the husband’s filing of four ancillary lawsuits that were consolidated with the divorce. O’Connor v. O’Connor, 73 Mass.App.Ct. 1109 (Unpublished) (December 9, 2008)

Attorney Jonathan Fields of Fields and Dennis, Wellesley, Massachusetts is a family law and divorce lawyer serving the Greater Boston region.

Filed Under: Massachusetts Divorce, Massachusetts Family Law, Quarterly Reviews

Premarital Asset Not Divided

Premarital Asset Not Divided– In a case involving a 16 year marriage, the Appeals Court upheld a Probate Court judgment that awarded an equal division of assets but permitted the husband to retain a premarital gift worth $600,000 on the date of their marriage (but not the appreciation of that asset which the court divided 60-40 in favor of the husband.)  While noting that there are no “hard and fast rules” regarding premarital assets, the Court found significant the fact that the monies were kept in the husband’s name.  The Appeals Court states, however, that it would have been preferable if the court had considered the role of each party in “managing the assets, and whether the assets in question had been kept separate or commingled with the couple’s jointly owned property.”  Burr v. Burr, 73 Mass.App.Ct. 1105 (Unpublished) (November 18, 2008).

Attorney Jonathan Fields of Fields and Dennis, Wellesley, Massachusetts is a family law and divorce lawyer serving the Greater Boston region.

Filed Under: Massachusetts Divorce, Massachusetts Family Law, Quarterly Reviews

Imputed Income

Imputed Income – The Appeals Court affirmed a divorce judgment in which an annual income of $120,000 was imputed, or attributed, to the wife, finding that she could earn such income “with reasonable effort.”  The wife in this case had a history of earning a salary in that range and her underemployment was a result of her “unilateral decision.”  Alexander v. Alexander, 72 Mass.App.Ct. 1118 (Unpublished) (September 30, 2008)

Attorney Jonathan Fields of Fields and Dennis, Wellesley, Massachusetts is a family law and divorce lawyer serving the Greater Boston region.

Filed Under: Massachusetts Divorce, Quarterly Reviews

  • « Previous Page
  • 1
  • …
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6

Contact Us

Phone: 781.489.6776
Fax: 781.489.6233
80 William Street — Suite 210
Wellesley, MA 02481 USA

Recent Posts

Sheryl J. Dennis Quoted in Second Most Read Article in Massachusetts Lawyers Weekly

January 3, 2023

Attorney Sheryl Dennis was quoted in Massachusetts Lawyer Weekly’s second most read article of the year. The article discusses the feasibility of remote work from the viewpoint of a number of major law firms in the Boston area. If you are in the office, you are much more invested in the firm and the people […]

Fields and Dennis LLP Fundraiser for K9s for Warriors

December 1, 2022

Over the years Fields and Dennis have been proud to sponsor an annual holiday fundraiser for K9s for Warriors. We will be holding another holiday fundraiser through the end of the year. K9s For Warriors is a program to reduce veteran suicide and help our warriors return to a life of dignity and independence. The […]

Here are 4 Ways Divorced Parents Can Make the Holidays Joyful for Their Children – Attorney Vicki L. Shemin’s Article Featured on Divorcemag.com

November 29, 2022

Just because you and your ex-spouse are no longer together doesn’t mean you can’t co-parent peacefully during the holiday season. There are many ways divorced parents can make the holidays memorable for their children. Read the full article on Divorcemag.com https://www.divorcemag.com/blog/here-are-4-ways-divorced-parents-can-make-the-holidays-joyful-for-their-children

Congratulations to Fields and Dennis LLP Firm members who were selected as Top Lawyers for 2022 by Boston Magazine

November 22, 2022

  Fields and Dennis LLP is proud to congratulate Sheryl Dennis, Vicki L. Shemin and Jonathan Fields on being selected as Top Lawyers for 2022 by Boston Magazine. The Boston Magazine Top Lawyers list is extensively peer-reviewed and curated to bring together the top quality attorneys in Boston, making it easier for anyone seeking an […]

Sheryl J. Dennis Quoted in Massachusetts Lawyers Weekly

November 16, 2022

Attorney Sheryl Dennis was quoted in Massachusetts Lawyer Weekly this week. The article discusses the feasibility of remote work from the viewpoint of a number of major law firms in the Boston area. If you are in the office, you are much more invested in the firm and the people around you. It really is […]

Contact Us

Please use the contact form below to email Fields and Dennis LLP.

    Your Name (required)

    Daytime phone (required)

    Your Email (required)

    Brief description of your legal issue:

    Sending a message to Fields and Dennis LLP does not constitute an Attorney Client relationship. Please review our Communication Policy before sending any messages.

    Location

    FIELDS AND DENNIS LLP
    80 William Street — Suite 210
    Wellesley, MA 02481 USA
    (T) 781.489.6776
    (F) 781.489.6233

    You can also find us on…

    Recent Blogs

    • Attorney Jon Fields receives the 2022 John Adams Fiske Award
    • Attorneys Sheryl Dennis and Hugh Ferguson quoted in Newsweek
    • Sheryl J. Dennis Quoted in Second Most Read Article in Massachusetts Lawyers Weekly
    • Fields and Dennis LLP Fundraiser for K9s for Warriors
    • Here are 4 Ways Divorced Parents Can Make the Holidays Joyful for Their Children – Attorney Vicki L. Shemin’s Article Featured on Divorcemag.com

    Recent Firm News & Coverage

    • Sheryl J. Dennis Quoted in Second Most Read Article in Massachusetts Lawyers Weekly

    • Fields and Dennis LLP Fundraiser for K9s for Warriors

    • Here are 4 Ways Divorced Parents Can Make the Holidays Joyful for Their Children – Attorney Vicki L. Shemin’s Article Featured on Divorcemag.com

    • Congratulations to Fields and Dennis LLP Firm members who were selected as Top Lawyers for 2022 by Boston Magazine

    • Sheryl J. Dennis Quoted in Massachusetts Lawyers Weekly

    The Boston metro family law, divorce and estate planning attorneys at the law firm of Fields and Dennis LLP are based in the Newton Wellesley area and serve the city of Newton: Auburndale, Chestnut Hill, Newton Centre, Newton Corner, Newton Upper Falls, Newton Lower Falls, Nonantum, Oak Hill, Waban and West Newton and town of Wellesley: Babson Park, Wellesley Hills, Wellesley Square Fields and Dennis also serves many clients in the Greater Boston and Massachusetts region including Ashland, Dover, Holliston, Medfield, Needham, Sherborn, Westwood, and all of Massachusetts. Attorney Jonathan Fields is a recognized authority on bitcoin and divorce

    Copyright 2021 Fields and Dennis LLP

    Attorneys | Divorce Attorneys | Estate Planning Attorneys | Firm Overview |

    Disclaimer | Privacy Policy | Contact | Pay Invoice