The Appeals Court affirmed a Probate Court judgment attributing income to the husband in a divorce case. The case reminds practitioners that courts may consider the earning capacity of a party in appropriate circumstances. Where a party is voluntarily earning beneath his/her capacity, such attribution is “particularly appropriate,” according to the Appeals Court. Similarly, such attribution may also be appropriate where a judge determines that a career change is voluntary. Where a judge attributes income, however, the Appeals Court noted that a specific amount of income ought to be attributed. C.D.L. v. M.M.L., 72 Mass.App.Ct. 146 (June 27, 2008).
Footer
Fields and Dennis LLP
80 William Street — Suite 210
Wellesley, MA 02481 USA
Directions
(781) 489-6776
contact@fieldsdennis.com
You can also find us on…
Recent Blogs
- Please join me for the upcoming MCLE webinar:
- Attorney Vicki L. Shemin To Chair MBA Program: “The Parent Coordinator’s Challenge: How to Keep Parents in the Boat if They Want to Jump Ship”
- Engagement ring decision closes important gap in family law cases
- Fields and Dennis LLP Featured in Best Law Firms® in the United States 2025 edition
- Fields and Dennis, LLP Welcomes David M. Lipshutz, Esq.; Molly Cochran, Esq.; Susan J. Kay, Esq. and Anne C. Rosenberg, Esq.
Contact Us
Please use the contact form below to email Fields and Dennis LLP.